California: Governor Newsom suing President Trump and Department of Defense for illegal takeover of CalGuard unit
The Californer/10316316

Trending...
News

Jun 9, 2025

Governor Newsom suing President Trump and Department of Defense for illegal takeover of CalGuard unit

"An unmistakable step toward authoritarianism"

What you need to know: Standing up for state sovereignty throughout the nation, California Governor Newsom and Attorney General Bonta are suing the Trump administration for its illegal takeover of the California National Guard (CalGuard).

LOS ANGELES – Following President Trump's call to arrest Governor Gavin Newsom, the Governor and Attorney General Rob Bonta today are filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration to end the illegal and unnecessary takeover of a CalGuard unit, which has needlessly escalated chaos and violence in the Los Angeles region. The lawsuit, which names President Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and the Department of Defense, outlines why the takeover violates the U.S. Constitution and exceeds the President's Title 10 authority, not only because the takeover occurred without the consent or input of the Governor, as federal law requires,  but also because it was unwarranted.

"Donald Trump is creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and overstepping his authority. This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic. Every governor, red or blue, should reject this outrageous overreach. This is beyond incompetence — this is him intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities, and endangering the principles of our great democracy. It is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism. We will not let this stand."

Governor Gavin Newsom

"President Trump's order calling federalized National Guard troops into Los Angeles – over the objections of the Governor and local law enforcement – is unnecessary and counterproductive. It's also deeply unfair to the members of the National Guard who are hard at work every day protecting our state, preparing for and responding to emergencies, and training so that, if called, they can fight our nation's wars," said Attorney General Bonta. "Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion. The President is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under the law– and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order."

Under the California Constitution, Governor Newsom is the Commander-in-Chief of the California National Guard. In the lawsuit, Governor Newsom and Attorney General Bonta explain that the federal government has overstepped its legal authority and bypassed the Governor's approval to take over a unit of CalGuard, in a situation where federal government intervention was not needed and did not meet the necessary criteria for federalization. The unrest in Los Angeles is nowhere close to rising to the level of a "rebellion" beyond the capacity of local and state authorities to control, nor is it different in kind from other similar situations in recent years that were brought under control by local authorities with no need for military intervention. The Department of Defense's mobilization order also failed to comply with President Trump's own direction to coordinate with the Governor and the National Guard.

Trump's illegal takeover

On Friday, June 6, 2025, the federal government, through Immigration and Customs Enforcement, began conducting widespread operations throughout Los Angeles without providing notification to local law enforcement. During the course of these operations, ICE officers took actions that inflamed tensions, including the arrest and detainment of children, and military-style operations that sparked panic in the community. The Department of Homeland Security reported that its enforcement activities on June 6 resulted in the arrest of 44 individuals, two of whom appear to have been minors. Only five of those arrested reportedly had any criminal history.

More on The Californer
In response, community members began protesting to express opposition to these violent tactics, the President's heavy-handed, violent immigration agenda, and the arrest of innocent people, and to express solidarity with and concern for the individuals and families most directly impacted by the enforcement actions taking place in their community. Protests continued for two more days, and although some violent and illegal incidents were reported — leading to justified arrests by state and local authorities — these protests were largely nonviolent and involved citizens exercising their First Amendment right to protest. At no point did these protests necessitate federal intervention, and local and state law enforcement remained in control of the situation.  Local law enforcement, despite no communication or advanced notice from the federal government, responded quickly and did not request federal assistance.

No basis for takeover

Soon after protests began, on June 7, President Trump issued a memorandum entitled "Department of Defense Security for the Protection of Department of Homeland Security Functions," purporting to authorize the Department of Defense to call up 2,000 National Guard personnel into federal service for a period of 60 days, and declaring a "rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States" and directing the Secretary of Defense to coordinate with state governors and the National Guard to commandeer state militias. This order was not specific to California and suggests that the President could assume control of any state militia.

President Trump then began posting to social media that the protests in California were out of control and that the federal government had taken over the California National Guard — further inflaming fear in the community, inciting fear and violence, and endangering state sovereignty. Notably, by the time the National Guard arrived on Sunday morning, the protests had dissipated thanks to local law enforcement, and the streets were quiet. The President's Actions and the military presence inflamed the very protest and violence it was supposedly meant to suppress.

President Trump's unprecedented order attempts to usurp state authority and resources via 10 U.S.C. § 12406, a statute that has been invoked on its own only once before in modern history and for highly unusual circumstances  —  when President Richard Nixon called upon the National Guard to deliver the mail during the 1970 Postal Service Strike. This is also the first time since 1965 — when President Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators — that a president has activated a state's National Guard without a request from the state's governor.

And as U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem previously said, federalization of the National Guard "would be a direct attack on states' rights."

Ending Trump's abuse of power

Today, Governor Newsom and Attorney General Bonta stand up for all states' authority through this lawsuit. The lawsuit asks the court to end the federal government's gross overstep of authority and require President Trump and Secretary Hegseth to follow the appropriate legal steps to take over any state militia, including an order issued through the Governor.

The lawsuit also explains that:
  • The federalization of the California National Guard deprives California of resources to protect itself and its citizens, including those working on drug interdiction at the border, and of critical responders in the event of a state of emergency — such as the January 2025 firestorm in Los Angeles, which CalGuard responded to.
  • 10 U.S.C. § 12406 requires that the Governor consent to federalization of the National Guard, which Governor Newsom was not given the opportunity to do prior to their deployment.
  • The President's unlawful order infringes on Governor Newsom's role as Commander-in-Chief of the California National Guard and violates the state's sovereign right to control and have available its National Guard in the absence of a lawful invocation of federal power.
  • The situation in Los Angeles didn't meet the criteria for federalization, which includes invasion by a foreign country, rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States, and being unable to execute federal laws. At no point was this the case in the Los Angeles area, where local and state law enforcement remained in control.

WHAT THEY WERE SAYING:

More on The Californer
Donald Trump: In a Townhall with ABC in 2020, Trump said he couldn't move the National Guard into Democratic-run cities without the Governor's approval. See here and here for the full transcript.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Mr. President, you promised four years ago at the Republican Convention, I'm going to restore law and order.

TRUMP: And I have, except in Democrat run cities. Look, we have laws. We have to go by the laws. We can't move in the National Guard. I can call insurrection but there's no reason to ever do that, even in a Portland case.

We can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor. If a governor or a mayor is a Democrat and they — like in Portland, we call them constantly. I just spoke to the governor yesterday because we're giving them relief on the fires. We're giving them a — an emergency declaration.

Kristy Noem:

Press releases, Recent news

https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkur..." rel="nofollow external noopener">https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/x?linkurl=https...">https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=h...">https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/copy_link?linku...">Recent news

ICYMI: All democratic governors stand united against President Trump's militarization in Los Angeles

Jun 8, 2025

News In case you missed it, every single Democratic governor agrees: Donald Trump's attempts to militarize California are an alarming abuse of power. Democratic Governors Association: "President Trump's move to deploy California's National Guard is an alarming abuse...

ICYMI: California stands united against chaotic and inflammatory federal takeover of California National Guard Unit

Jun 8, 2025

News In case you missed it, last night, President Trump – disregarding Governor Newsom – federalized California National Guard troops in Los Angeles at a time when there were no unmet law enforcement needs. In fact, local law enforcement efforts successfully...

Governor Gavin Newsom on speaking out peacefully

Jun 7, 2025

News Los Angeles, California – Governor Gavin Newsom today issued the following statement in response to speaking out peacefully on the federal government's immigration actions: The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000...

Filed Under: Government, State
Show All News | Report Violation

0 Comments

Latest on The Californer