Alander Lee Pulliam, Authored Businessman, Sues Usc Transportation Department For Defamation
The Californer/10304612

LOS ANGELES - Californer -- Alander Lee Pulliam, a Harvard Law graduate and successful businessman, has filed a lawsuit against the USC Transportation Department. The lawsuit alleges a coordinated smear campaign led by individuals including Josh Carelli, Ruben, Brain Chavez, and Angela, who fabricated damaging narratives about Pulliam. These unfounded claims have caused severe repercussions on his personal and professional life.

The genesis of the allegations dates back to a complaint by an anonymous individual on February 5, 2025, accusing Pulliam of "loitering" at USC Transportation checkpoints and engaging in inappropriate behavior towards staff. Pulliam firmly denies these claims, arguing they are an affront to his integrity and evidence of a broader pattern of defamation.

Pulliam's lawsuit outlines the seriousness of defamatory claims, highlighting the emotional distress and professional repercussions inflicted upon him. The claims also jeopardized his philanthropic endeavors, including initiatives to empower marginalized communities. In collaboration with Allied Universal Security Services, Pulliam has consistently advocated for a positive environment and has worked to support education, youth initiatives, and health awareness campaigns.

More on The Californer

• Laurie McLennan Identified as Leading Luxury Real Estate Authority for La Quinta's Premier Private
• Christmas Gift Ideas for Her: Affordable Luxury Jewellery
• Easton Cain Debuts Parabolic: A One-Hour Midnight Exhibition Opening New Year's Day
• Car Wash in Northridge's $8 Price is Cheaper Than Competitors Prices Even With a Promo Code
• VCCCD Board Elects Leadership for New Year

The lawsuit articulates three primary causes of action: defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and seeks compensatory and punitive damages to rectify the wounds inflicted by the falsehoods. It also calls for substantial reforms within the USC Transportation Department and highlights the need for transparency, accountability, and a supportive culture.

"This case is not just about me; it's about anyone who has faced unjust condemnation," Pulliam stated. "I'm fighting for justice and to prevent future occurrences of such behavior."

The implications of this case extend beyond Pulliam himself, resonating deeply within the USC community and the broader landscape of academia and business. Pulliam's commitment to seeking justice will likely resonate with many who have encountered similar challenges, and his dedication to philanthropy and community service exemplifies his commitment to promoting positive change.

Pulliam's pursuit of justice is a powerful reminder of the importance of truth and accountability, and the devastating consequences of defamation on individuals and institutions. Through his tireless efforts to rectify the situation, Pulliam is fighting for a more just and compassionate society.