Allegations of Misconduct Against Palm Springs Unified School District Intensify
The Californer/10284135

PALM SPRINGS, Calif. - Californer -- Allegations of misconduct against the Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD) have intensified today, with parent advocate Ryan Carson announcing he has filed a formal complaint with the California Attorney General's office. The complaint centers on the district's mishandling of multiple incidents involving alleged FERPA violations, retaliation, and a persistent pattern of dishonesty in official communications.

Mr. Carson initially filed a complaint with the California Department of Education (CDE) on May 23, 2024, detailing the unauthorized disclosure of confidential student information by a PSUSD teacher and the district's subsequent failure to adequately address the issue. Despite acknowledging the violation, the district has repeatedly misrepresented the timeline of events, falsely claiming in official documents that an incident from January 2024 occurred in Spring 2023.

More on The Californer

• Champagne, Caviar Bumps & Pole Performances — Welcome the New Year Early with HandPicked Social Club
• A New Soul Album: Heart Of Kwanzaa, 7-Day Celebration
• Allegiant Management Group Named 2025 Market Leader in Orlando by PropertyManagement.com
• NAFMNP Awarded USDA Cooperative Agreement to Continue MarketLink Program Under FFAB
• Shore Scripts Announces Fall 2025 Short Film Fund Grant Recipients Al Benoit and Ericka Lavin

"Even after I provided clear evidence of the district's inaccuracies and omissions, their amended Notice of Decision continues to distort the facts and dismiss my concerns about systemic issues," said Mr. Carson. "This blatant disregard for transparency and accountability is unacceptable and demonstrates a complete lack of commitment to protecting students."

The amended "Notice of Decision" issued on June 24, 2024, acknowledges the FERPA violation and corrects the timeline of the incident from Spring 2023 to January 2024. Unlike the original notice dated May 21, 2024, the amended version removes references to a previous investigation in Spring 2023 and no longer claims that "the matter was addressed at that time." Both notices state that the finding was addressed with the teacher, but neither provides specific details about corrective actions such as a letter of reprimand or mandatory FERPA training. The discrepancy in the timeline and the removal of references to a prior incident raise questions about the accuracy of the district's initial response and its handling of the situation.

More on The Californer

• California: Governor Newsom launches new initiatives to partner with tech policy experts and accelerate responsible AI in state government
• Costa Oil - 10 Minute Oil Change Surpasses 70 Locations with Construction of San Antonio, TX Stores — Eyes Growth Via Acquisition or Being Acquired
• LaTerra and Respark Under Contract with AIMCO to Acquire a $455M, 7-Property Chicago Multifamily Portfolio
• Record Revenue, Tax Tailwinds, and AI-Driven Scale: Why Off The Hook YS Inc. Is Emerging as a Standout in the $57 Billion U.S. Marine Market
• VSee Health (N A S D A Q: VSEE) Secures $6.0M At-Market Investment, Accelerates Expansion as Revenues Surge

Mr. Carson's complaint to the Attorney General's office alleges multiple violations, including potential falsification of official documents under California Penal Code Section 115 PC. He has also accused the district of retaliation, citing evidence that they pressured the teacher to file a restraining order against him after he raised concerns about her conduct in a separate 2023 incident involving communication with his minor son against his wishes.

Throughout his communications with the district, Mr. Carson has consistently requested written responses to his concerns. However, the district has repeatedly failed to provide substantive written replies, instead insisting on in-person meetings despite Mr. Carson's clearly stated preference for documented communication.

The complaint seeks a thorough investigation into the district's practices, implementation of stronger privacy protections, and measures to prevent retaliation against parents who advocate for their children.