Trending...
- Southern Soul Artist Moe Z Releases New Single 'Set It Out' Distributed by Morris Day Entertainment
- Skool Alternatives Reddit: Skool vs Circle vs Whop - Did you join one yet?
- Cal State LA secures funding for two artificial intelligence projects from CSU
LOS ANGELES, Jan. 7, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Recycling scams are costing California consumers potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in nickel and dime deposits stolen through fraudulent bottle and can refunds, Consumer Watchdog said today.
"Experts and insiders point to fraud rings that consist of crooked recycling centers and recycling processors as the source, along with an antiquated paper system of checks and balances run by the state that is easily fooled because it has not been fully digitized," the group said in its latest investigative report on the bottle deposit system's dysfunction, "Cash For Trash: Recycling Fraud in California."
Read the report here.
The report points to the need for a modern, automated bottle deposit system, like those in other bottle deposit states. This year California's Assembly will take up legislation already passed by the state Senate-- SB 38 (Wieckowski) -- to establish such a system run and managed by the beverage companies.
"California's bottle deposit program is run largely on a recycler honor system to claim payments from the state for bottle and can redemption," the report finds. "This reimbursement system uses state-set formulas easily manipulated by unscrupulous recyclers and waste haulers with little sophisticated scrutiny by regulators. Not a single other bottle deposit system in the continental United States emulates and copies California's. Instead, other bottle deposit systems put the responsibility onto the beverage industry to run bottle deposit programs and give them a stake in it. This helps to eliminate fraud because beverage producers lose money if they allow it."
"Fraud occurs when deposit containers are recycled more than once; when recycling centers and processors that buy materials from them for resale fudge the record-keeping, including the weight of loads used to calculate state payments; when out-of-state deposit containers on which no deposit was ever paid are redeemed; and when California non-deposit beverage containers are passed off as deposit beverages for state deposit refunds," the report continues.
More on The Californer
Among the report's recommendations:
The report describes common fraud tactics including:
"The state's recycling regulator, CalRecycle, is clearly unable to effectively and thoroughly contain fraud," said the report's author and advocate Liza Tucker. "It also appears that Governor Newsom has no plan to shut down fraud, and the Administration needs to come up with one. The Governor has made it clear that he wants to build a circular economy that maximizes recycling to minimize waste, cut pollution, and save energy. Massive fraud in the system is only getting in the way of that vision."
More on The Californer
For more on the dysfunction of the bottle deposit system, see Consumer Watchdog previous reports:
Waste Haulers: Square Peg In the Circular Economy
https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/report/waste-haulers-square-peg-circular-economy
Trashed: How California Recycling Failed And How To Fix It
https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/report/trashed-how-california-recycling-failed-and-how-fix-it
Half A Nickel: How California Consumers Get Ripped Off On Every Bottle Deposit They Pay
https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/report/half-nickel-how-california-consumers-get-ripped-every-bottle-deposit-they-pay
SOURCE Consumer Watchdog
Related Links
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org
"Experts and insiders point to fraud rings that consist of crooked recycling centers and recycling processors as the source, along with an antiquated paper system of checks and balances run by the state that is easily fooled because it has not been fully digitized," the group said in its latest investigative report on the bottle deposit system's dysfunction, "Cash For Trash: Recycling Fraud in California."
Read the report here.
The report points to the need for a modern, automated bottle deposit system, like those in other bottle deposit states. This year California's Assembly will take up legislation already passed by the state Senate-- SB 38 (Wieckowski) -- to establish such a system run and managed by the beverage companies.
"California's bottle deposit program is run largely on a recycler honor system to claim payments from the state for bottle and can redemption," the report finds. "This reimbursement system uses state-set formulas easily manipulated by unscrupulous recyclers and waste haulers with little sophisticated scrutiny by regulators. Not a single other bottle deposit system in the continental United States emulates and copies California's. Instead, other bottle deposit systems put the responsibility onto the beverage industry to run bottle deposit programs and give them a stake in it. This helps to eliminate fraud because beverage producers lose money if they allow it."
"Fraud occurs when deposit containers are recycled more than once; when recycling centers and processors that buy materials from them for resale fudge the record-keeping, including the weight of loads used to calculate state payments; when out-of-state deposit containers on which no deposit was ever paid are redeemed; and when California non-deposit beverage containers are passed off as deposit beverages for state deposit refunds," the report continues.
More on The Californer
- Buy The Crave Launches Premium Creatine and Natural Wellness Supplements for Modern Lifestyles
- Long Beach Parks, Recreation and Marine's Homeland Cultural Center Presents DanceFest at Cesar Chavez Park Amphitheater on August 16
- Sisu, a Portrait of Grit, Connection and Triumph, Premieres on Documentary Showcase
- New Liz Taylor Book Coming Soon: Chasing Elizabeth Taylor
- City of Long Beach Experienced a 4% Decrease in Fireworks-Related Reports on July 4
Among the report's recommendations:
- Switch to an Extended Producer Responsibility System via passage of SB 38 (Sen. Bob Wieckowski) to institute a modernized system at big supermarkets and recycling centers featuring Reverse Vending Machines and Bag Drop Machines that can screen containers for refund eligibility.
- Require processors to pay recycling centers for all scrap, CRV, processing and administrative payments by check or electronic transfer. No cash.
- Require all recycling centers to use electronic record-keeping and submit receipts and transaction logs electronically to the agency with each load, along with amounts of scrap material purchased and its value in each load.
- Require all recycling centers to ID and report customers with large loads to CalRecycle daily to flag for investigation those bringing in unusually large quantities of containers for redemption.
- Set up an electronic tracking system requiring processors to report to CalRecycle all CRV loads bought, sold, and shipped to end users and to report inventory on a monthly basis.
- Require processors to report to CalRecycle three days before exports of any CRV material so that CalRecycle can inspect for non-CRV material prior to shipping.
The report describes common fraud tactics including:
- Repeatedly weighing the same truck carrying deposit containers for recycling. By weighing the same truck repeatedly, recyclers and processors that buy the materials can claim state payments for the California Redemption Value (CRV) on deposit containers more than once.
- Recycling the same containers repeatedly. Unscrupulous processors can purchase loose containers from recycling centers, and instead of baling them for sale, roll the containers off the truck and make bags of containers taken by individuals to recycling centers all over again.
- False documentation of "phantom" containers. Processors involved with recycling centers can concoct "phantom" containers that exist only on paper and claim payment from the state.
- Doctoring weight tickets. Recycling centers can doctor weight tickets by claiming additional weight that does not exist on their reports to CalRecycle in order to boost the amount of CRV reimbursement.
- Padding the load with non-CRV containers – Recycling centers can buy non-CRV glass containers such as empty wine bottles or manufacturer rejects, break them up, and mix them in with CRV bottles to claim the whole load as deposit-carrying containers for state reimbursement.
- Importing non-CRV containers from out of state – Containers are brought in illegally from states and countries such as Arizona, Nevada, and Mexico for redemption by organizers of rackets.
"The state's recycling regulator, CalRecycle, is clearly unable to effectively and thoroughly contain fraud," said the report's author and advocate Liza Tucker. "It also appears that Governor Newsom has no plan to shut down fraud, and the Administration needs to come up with one. The Governor has made it clear that he wants to build a circular economy that maximizes recycling to minimize waste, cut pollution, and save energy. Massive fraud in the system is only getting in the way of that vision."
More on The Californer
- The Blue Luna Encourages Local Schools to Take Steps to Enhance Safety for Students and Staff
- Wise Business Plans Launches Turnkey Startup Packages to Help Entrepreneurs Start and Scale
- CarSeek Re-Launch: A New Look, A Better Experience for Car Buyers
- California: Governor Newsom provides $11 million to organizations helping underserved job seekers find training and employment
- For Artificial Intelligence Appreciation Day: Celebrate it with a poem about AI called "Robot Love"
For more on the dysfunction of the bottle deposit system, see Consumer Watchdog previous reports:
Waste Haulers: Square Peg In the Circular Economy
https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/report/waste-haulers-square-peg-circular-economy
Trashed: How California Recycling Failed And How To Fix It
https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/report/trashed-how-california-recycling-failed-and-how-fix-it
Half A Nickel: How California Consumers Get Ripped Off On Every Bottle Deposit They Pay
https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/report/half-nickel-how-california-consumers-get-ripped-every-bottle-deposit-they-pay
SOURCE Consumer Watchdog
Related Links
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org
Filed Under: Business
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- Stuck Doing Math or Figuring Out Life's Numbers? Calculator.now Makes It Stupidly Simple
- Cal State LA secures funding for two artificial intelligence projects from CSU
- Colbert Packaging Announces WBENC Recognition
- New Mobile Car Detailing Platform Connects Drivers with On-Demand Local Pros
- Over the past three months, California seized $476 million worth of unlicensed cannabis products
- California scores more clean energy records: 9 in 10 days this year partially powered by 100% clean energy
- "Mobile Suit Gundam" Takes Over San Diego Comic-Con 2025
- DivX Empowers Media Enthusiasts with Free Expert Guides for Advanced MP4 Management
- Assent Expands Executive Team to Accelerate Global Growth & Innovation
- The World's Largest Green Economic Revolution Emerges as Nature, Tech, and Finance Converge
- Hamilton Zanze Sponsors the Acquisition of Two Garden-Style Communities in Reno Area
- Meet a Scientologist Captures Greece's Timeless Beauty with Videographer Lambros Malamas
- Vinnetwork Unveils Decentralized AI Platform with Vinnetwork(VIN) Token to Challenge Tech Giants' Data Monopoly
- Moovs Launches Advanced Contact Center Solution for Large-Scale Transportation Operations
- Centennial Flyers to Become Colorado's First Launch Customer for All-Electric B23 Energic Aircraft
- Second Annual Artists' Rights Advocate Award to Be Presented at The Comedy Store on July 17th
- Pyro Marketing Opens New Digital Marketing Company in Saint Petersburg to Power Growth for Fitness and Ecommerce Brands
- Dr. John Salerno of Salerno Wellness Introduces Their New Full Body Capsule for Advanced LED Light Therapy Patient Treatments
- Ship Overseas Inc. Expands Specialized Shipping Services
- Governor Newsom announces additional deployment of California resources to support New Mexico following Texas and Oregon disaster response efforts