Trending...
- "Leading From Day One: The Essential Guide for New Supervisors" Draws from 25+ Years of International Management Experience - 326
- New Slotozilla Project Explores What Happens When the World Goes Silent - 262
- Ventura College Launches County's First Speech-Language Pathology Assistant Program - 247
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Upstart Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UPST) securities between November 9, 2021 and May 9, 2022, inclusive (the "Class Period") have until July 12, 2022 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in Ward v. Upstart Holdings, Inc., No. 22-cv-02856 (N.D. Cal.). Commenced on May 13, 2022, the Upstart class action lawsuit – captioned Ward v. Upstart Holdings, Inc., No. 22-cv-02856 (N.D. Cal.) – charges Upstart and certain of its top executive officers with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you suffered significant losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Upstart class action lawsuit, provide your information here:
https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-upstart-holdings-inc-class-action-lawsuit-upst.html
You can also contact attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at jsanchez@rgrdlaw.com. Lead plaintiff motions for the Upstart class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than July 12, 2022.
More on The Californer
CASE ALLEGATIONS: Upstart is a cloud-based artificial intelligence ("AI") lending platform. Upstart claims that "AI lending enables a superior loan product with improved economics that can be shared between consumers and lenders." Moreover, Upstart "leverage[s] the power of AI to more accurately quantify the true risk of a loan." Upstart recognizes revenue primarily from fees paid by banks.
The Upstart class action lawsuit alleges that, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that: (i) Upstart's AI model could not adequately account for macroeconomic factors such as interest rates that impact the market-clearing price for loans; (ii) as a result, Upstart was experiencing negative impact on its conversion rate; (iii) thus, Upstart was reasonably likely to use its balance sheet to fund loans; and (iv) consequently, defendants' positive statements about Upstart's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
On May 9, 2022, Upstart announced its first quarter 2022 financial results in a press release. Therein, Upstart reduced its fiscal 2022 guidance, expecting revenue of approximately $1.25 billion and contribution margin of 48%. During the related conference call, Upstart's Chief Financial Officer cited "rising interest rates and rising consumer delinquencies putting downward pressure on conversion." On this news, Upstart's stock price fell approximately 56%, damaging investors.
THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Upstart securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Upstart class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Upstart class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Upstart class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery of the Upstart class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
More on The Californer
ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading complex class action firms representing plaintiffs in securities fraud cases. The Firm is ranked #1 on the 2021 ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report for recovering nearly $2 billion for investors last year alone – more than triple the amount recovered by any other plaintiffs' firm. With 200 lawyers in 9 offices, Robbins Geller's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest securities class action recovery ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:
https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html
Attorney advertising.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Contacts
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
655 W. Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101
J.C. Sanchez, 800-449-4900
jsanchez@rgrdlaw.com
https://www.linkedin.com/company/rgrdlaw
https://twitter.com/rgrdlaw
https://www.facebook.com/rgrdlaw
If you suffered significant losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Upstart class action lawsuit, provide your information here:
https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-upstart-holdings-inc-class-action-lawsuit-upst.html
You can also contact attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at jsanchez@rgrdlaw.com. Lead plaintiff motions for the Upstart class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than July 12, 2022.
More on The Californer
- Los Angeles Affordable Healthcare Provider CCHC Reminds Families to Prioritize Vaccines and Wellness for Back-to-School Season
- Meet a Scientologist Makes Magic with Larry Soffer
- ICYMI: California hotline receives 1,200 reports of hate in 2024
- Open Art Call | The Art of Artificial Intelligence | Copenhagen
- Jase has compounded Ivermectin and Mebendazole together to effectively treat parasitic infections!
CASE ALLEGATIONS: Upstart is a cloud-based artificial intelligence ("AI") lending platform. Upstart claims that "AI lending enables a superior loan product with improved economics that can be shared between consumers and lenders." Moreover, Upstart "leverage[s] the power of AI to more accurately quantify the true risk of a loan." Upstart recognizes revenue primarily from fees paid by banks.
The Upstart class action lawsuit alleges that, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that: (i) Upstart's AI model could not adequately account for macroeconomic factors such as interest rates that impact the market-clearing price for loans; (ii) as a result, Upstart was experiencing negative impact on its conversion rate; (iii) thus, Upstart was reasonably likely to use its balance sheet to fund loans; and (iv) consequently, defendants' positive statements about Upstart's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
On May 9, 2022, Upstart announced its first quarter 2022 financial results in a press release. Therein, Upstart reduced its fiscal 2022 guidance, expecting revenue of approximately $1.25 billion and contribution margin of 48%. During the related conference call, Upstart's Chief Financial Officer cited "rising interest rates and rising consumer delinquencies putting downward pressure on conversion." On this news, Upstart's stock price fell approximately 56%, damaging investors.
THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Upstart securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Upstart class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Upstart class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Upstart class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery of the Upstart class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
More on The Californer
- California: Californication of AI? Golden State is #1 in AI, and the birthplace of modern tech, so yeah — be quiet, Ted Cruz
- Premieres of 10th Annual NY Dog Film Festival & 8th Annual NY Cat Film Festival on Sunday, October 26, 2025 to Benefit Animal Lighthouse Rescue
- Inwebify Announces Launch of Scalable and Redundant Cloud Hosting Platform
- $20 Price Target in Noble Capital Research Report as Deal is Signed for NFL Yearbook Advertising Across 25 Stadiums for AI Powered Sports Leader $SEGG
- Zenni Optical Hosts Expert Panel Following the Launch of EyeQLenz™ with Zenni ID Guard™ Featuring Technology Experts Cybersecurity Girl, Judner Aura and Amber Mac
ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading complex class action firms representing plaintiffs in securities fraud cases. The Firm is ranked #1 on the 2021 ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report for recovering nearly $2 billion for investors last year alone – more than triple the amount recovered by any other plaintiffs' firm. With 200 lawyers in 9 offices, Robbins Geller's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest securities class action recovery ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:
https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html
Attorney advertising.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Contacts
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
655 W. Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101
J.C. Sanchez, 800-449-4900
jsanchez@rgrdlaw.com
https://www.linkedin.com/company/rgrdlaw
https://twitter.com/rgrdlaw
https://www.facebook.com/rgrdlaw
Filed Under: Business
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- C3.ai, Inc. (AI) Investors Who Lost Money Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Fraud Lawsuit
- California: Governor Newsom proclaims Constitution Day and Citizenship Day
- California: Governor Newsom signs legislation 9.17.25
- New Leadership and Renovations Usher in Next Chapter for Sunrise Manor
- Following Trump's politicization of CDC, West Coast states issue unified vaccine recommendations — California breaks from future federal guidance with new law
- Who Will Win the 2025 WNBA Finals? OddsTrader Shares Live Betting Odds and Projections
- Silva Construction Weighs In on the Most Popular Home Design Trends for 2026
- Geeks5g Creative Marketing: The Powerhouse Behind Business Growth
- Wise Business Plans Now Serves Entrepreneurs in Los Angeles with Tailored Business Plan Writing
- Proposition 1 continues delivering support for vulnerable homeless populations in California
- Agemin Unveils Breakthrough AI Model for Biometric Age Estimation, Setting New Standards in Online Child Safety
- Turnout Secures $21M in Seed Funding to Fuel Mission to Simplify Government Bureaucracy
- Teamsters Local 2010, UC Labor Unions File Historic Lawsuit Against Trump Administration
- Strategic Partnerships with Defiant Space Corp and Emtel Energy USA Powerfully Enhance Solar Tech Leader with NASA Agreements: Ascent Solar $ASTI
- 120% Revenue Surge with Four Straight Profitable Quarters Signal a Breakout in the Multi-Billion Dollar Homebuilding Market: Innovative Designs $IVDN
- Leading Venture Capital Firms Recognize Wzzph Exchange's Technical Architecture and Security Framework as Industry Benchmark
- DivX Unveils Major DivX Software Update: Seamless Video Sharing and Customizable Playback Now Available
- Zoiko Supply Group Named Exclusive Distributor of Taj Mahal Rice in Caribbean, LATAM& African Market
- Software VS Paid Newsletter for Creating Side Income
- Nespolo Mechanical Helps New Mexico Families Save Thousands on Heating Costs This Fall