Trending...
- Grammy award-winning Cuban-Canadian artist Alex Cuba releases his 11th studio album, "Indole"
- $73.6M Pipeline, $10M Crypto Play & Legal Firepower: Why Investors Are Watching Cycurion (N A S D A Q: CYCU) Like a Hawk
- California: Crime is down in San Francisco, key law enforcement partnerships yield successful results
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Californer -- Last week a jury in Sacramento Superior Court issued a verdict in the case of Rios v. Pine Creek Care Center. The jurors were split on the verdict, with the outcome coming down to one or two of the 12 jurors on the panel. Pine Creek is a skilled nursing facility that employs nurses and therapists who provide compassionate, quality nursing care to elderly and infirm adults in the Sacramento area. The jury returned a verdict totaling more than $30 million against the defendants, which included Pine Creek and its affiliate Plum Healthcare.
The plantiffs claimed the staff at Pine Creek failed to prevent pressure sores on his heels during his brief stay in 2017, before returning home to convalesce after hip surgery. Pine Creek's attorneys presented strong medical evidence that disputed the plaintiff's claims, arguing there was no skin breakdown observed by nursing staff or Mr. Rios' treating physician during his stay. In fact, Mr. Rios was walking and moving around far better upon discharge than when he was admitted.
The limitations put on the defendants' ability to fully defend themselves, coupled with the court granting the plaintiffs' request to instruct the jury that the defendants engaged in a plan to maximize profits at the expense of patient care, which is both false and grossly prejudicial, are denials of the defendant's rights to due process and a fair trial that will be addressed on appeal.
More on The Californer
As evidenced by testimony presented at trial, 87-year-old Mr. Rios was at Pine Creek for 14 days, he both arrived at Pine Creek with redness on his heels went home from Pine Creek with redness on its heels, and left Pine Creek with a considerably better ability to walk than when he arrived from the hospital following hip surgery. The defendants strongly believe that his care at Pine Creek was reasonable, appropriate, and consistent with the doctor's orders.
Pine Creek is one of the premier skilled nursing facilities in the Sacramento area. At the time of Mr. Rios's stay Pine Creek was a CMS 5-Star facility overall, and it continues to be highly rated. The defendants were not allowed to present that information.
Pine Creek complied with state minimum staffing requirements, and Mr. Rios in fact progressed considerably in his post-surgery healing process while he was at Pine Creek, as evidenced by a significant increase in his ability to walk during his time at the facility. This is all consistent with Pine Creek's continuing focus on providing high-quality care to its residents, and that focus is reflected in its CMS ratings and reputation in the community. Plum Healthcare supported its affiliated facilities in their efforts to care for their residents.
More on The Californer
It's also very difficult to understand how the jury arrived at punitive damages in this case, much less the grossly exaggerated amount they awarded. Pine Creek has been under new ownership since 2021 when Providence Group acquired the operations of Plum Healthcare, which makes the punitive damages awarded all the more incomprehensible since those being "punished" by the award had nothing to do with Pine Creek or Mr. Rios at the time of his 2017 stay. Furthermore, Plum Healthcare's prior private equity shareholder was voluntarily dismissed from the case by the plaintiffs in 2021 and is not subject to the verdict, thus rebutting the public statements made by the plaintiff's attorney that the case "sends a message" to private equity.
Skilled nursing facilities and their dedicated staff members work very hard to care for their residents with love and respect. Verdicts like this undermine the very system that the state has set up to care for elderly and infirm Californians.
The case remains in active litigation with post-trial motions, and a planned appeal.
The plantiffs claimed the staff at Pine Creek failed to prevent pressure sores on his heels during his brief stay in 2017, before returning home to convalesce after hip surgery. Pine Creek's attorneys presented strong medical evidence that disputed the plaintiff's claims, arguing there was no skin breakdown observed by nursing staff or Mr. Rios' treating physician during his stay. In fact, Mr. Rios was walking and moving around far better upon discharge than when he was admitted.
The limitations put on the defendants' ability to fully defend themselves, coupled with the court granting the plaintiffs' request to instruct the jury that the defendants engaged in a plan to maximize profits at the expense of patient care, which is both false and grossly prejudicial, are denials of the defendant's rights to due process and a fair trial that will be addressed on appeal.
More on The Californer
- Investing in Greece: Your Definitive Real-Estate FAQ Guide
- California: Governor Newsom announces appointments
- California: TOMORROW: Governor Newsom to discuss the economic advancement and growth of the state
- California: Governor Newsom to Trump: We're suing immediately if you send troops into San Francisco
- Long Beach: City to Host Neighborhood Halloween Carnival at Silverado Park
As evidenced by testimony presented at trial, 87-year-old Mr. Rios was at Pine Creek for 14 days, he both arrived at Pine Creek with redness on his heels went home from Pine Creek with redness on its heels, and left Pine Creek with a considerably better ability to walk than when he arrived from the hospital following hip surgery. The defendants strongly believe that his care at Pine Creek was reasonable, appropriate, and consistent with the doctor's orders.
Pine Creek is one of the premier skilled nursing facilities in the Sacramento area. At the time of Mr. Rios's stay Pine Creek was a CMS 5-Star facility overall, and it continues to be highly rated. The defendants were not allowed to present that information.
Pine Creek complied with state minimum staffing requirements, and Mr. Rios in fact progressed considerably in his post-surgery healing process while he was at Pine Creek, as evidenced by a significant increase in his ability to walk during his time at the facility. This is all consistent with Pine Creek's continuing focus on providing high-quality care to its residents, and that focus is reflected in its CMS ratings and reputation in the community. Plum Healthcare supported its affiliated facilities in their efforts to care for their residents.
More on The Californer
- Altadena Mountain Rescue Team Recognized with 2025 ReadyCommunities Partnership National Service Award For Determination and Resilience
- Long Beach to Host Urban Forest Plan Kickoff Meeting
- Alander Lee Pulliam Jr. Declares His Bold Rise in Politics: A Mission Rooted in Service and Justice
- Alander Pulliam Unveils "Platform for Transformation" – A Bold Blueprint to Dismantle Oppres
- KeysCaribbean Offers 20 Percent Off Seven-Night Stays For Private Home Collection Properties
It's also very difficult to understand how the jury arrived at punitive damages in this case, much less the grossly exaggerated amount they awarded. Pine Creek has been under new ownership since 2021 when Providence Group acquired the operations of Plum Healthcare, which makes the punitive damages awarded all the more incomprehensible since those being "punished" by the award had nothing to do with Pine Creek or Mr. Rios at the time of his 2017 stay. Furthermore, Plum Healthcare's prior private equity shareholder was voluntarily dismissed from the case by the plaintiffs in 2021 and is not subject to the verdict, thus rebutting the public statements made by the plaintiff's attorney that the case "sends a message" to private equity.
Skilled nursing facilities and their dedicated staff members work very hard to care for their residents with love and respect. Verdicts like this undermine the very system that the state has set up to care for elderly and infirm Californians.
The case remains in active litigation with post-trial motions, and a planned appeal.
Source: PACS
Filed Under: Health
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- Local College Student Launches "Cleopatra" App to Make Cleaning Easy for Mercer County Residents
- Wohler announces release of additional Balance Control output tracking for its eSeries in-rack monitor range
- The Best Cartier Dupe Bracelets to Buy in 2025
- A Milestone of Giving: Ten Percent Group Donates £25,000 to Cure Parkinson's
- Suicide Commando Ignites DNA Lounge in a Night of Industrial Euphoria
- Tami Goveia Enters FabOver40, Inspiring Hollywood Legacy for Breast Cancer Cause
- Trump shutdown could soon halt food support for millions in California; CalFresh cards face possibility of no new funds in November
- Why Authentic Communication Will Outperform AI in the Future of Sales
- California: Governor Newsom to the Supreme Court: do not let Trump use the military against American communities
- Luxury Hospitality Advisors Launches Realtor Training Based on Five Star Hotel Service Training
- Swidget Launches Luminance™ to Help Schools Achieve Alyssa's Law Compliance
- Farther's Michael Lee Named One of InvestmentNews' Rising Stars of 2025
- Growing Demand for EVA Mats Signals Shift in Car Interior Market
- 4th Annual Holidays In The Village, A European Marketplace
- Moorpark College Named 2025 Pathway Champion for Driving Equity in Transfer Success
- MDRN MUSE Expands Insurance Network Coverage to Include Delta Dental & Cigna
- Chera TV: The Female-Led Platform Redefining Hollywood's Next Era of Storytelling
- California Student Aid Commission Launches 2026-27 Statewide Financial Aid Cycle at Ventura College
- California: Governor Newsom supports workers as Trump's shutdown hurts the economy
- California strengthens its pipeline for good-paying jobs, providing $25 million to train more than 22,000 workers through apprenticeship programs