Trending...
- Free $5,997 AI Program Reveals Blueprint for $1M One-Person Businesses - 149
- City of Long Beach Urges Caution as Coastal Flood and High Surf Warnings Take Effect - 146
- LS2 Partners with Angels Of Dirt's "Next Chapter Racer" Series Celebrating Women and Girls in Motorsports - 129
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Californer -- Last week a jury in Sacramento Superior Court issued a verdict in the case of Rios v. Pine Creek Care Center. The jurors were split on the verdict, with the outcome coming down to one or two of the 12 jurors on the panel. Pine Creek is a skilled nursing facility that employs nurses and therapists who provide compassionate, quality nursing care to elderly and infirm adults in the Sacramento area. The jury returned a verdict totaling more than $30 million against the defendants, which included Pine Creek and its affiliate Plum Healthcare.
The plantiffs claimed the staff at Pine Creek failed to prevent pressure sores on his heels during his brief stay in 2017, before returning home to convalesce after hip surgery. Pine Creek's attorneys presented strong medical evidence that disputed the plaintiff's claims, arguing there was no skin breakdown observed by nursing staff or Mr. Rios' treating physician during his stay. In fact, Mr. Rios was walking and moving around far better upon discharge than when he was admitted.
The limitations put on the defendants' ability to fully defend themselves, coupled with the court granting the plaintiffs' request to instruct the jury that the defendants engaged in a plan to maximize profits at the expense of patient care, which is both false and grossly prejudicial, are denials of the defendant's rights to due process and a fair trial that will be addressed on appeal.
More on The Californer
As evidenced by testimony presented at trial, 87-year-old Mr. Rios was at Pine Creek for 14 days, he both arrived at Pine Creek with redness on his heels went home from Pine Creek with redness on its heels, and left Pine Creek with a considerably better ability to walk than when he arrived from the hospital following hip surgery. The defendants strongly believe that his care at Pine Creek was reasonable, appropriate, and consistent with the doctor's orders.
Pine Creek is one of the premier skilled nursing facilities in the Sacramento area. At the time of Mr. Rios's stay Pine Creek was a CMS 5-Star facility overall, and it continues to be highly rated. The defendants were not allowed to present that information.
Pine Creek complied with state minimum staffing requirements, and Mr. Rios in fact progressed considerably in his post-surgery healing process while he was at Pine Creek, as evidenced by a significant increase in his ability to walk during his time at the facility. This is all consistent with Pine Creek's continuing focus on providing high-quality care to its residents, and that focus is reflected in its CMS ratings and reputation in the community. Plum Healthcare supported its affiliated facilities in their efforts to care for their residents.
More on The Californer
It's also very difficult to understand how the jury arrived at punitive damages in this case, much less the grossly exaggerated amount they awarded. Pine Creek has been under new ownership since 2021 when Providence Group acquired the operations of Plum Healthcare, which makes the punitive damages awarded all the more incomprehensible since those being "punished" by the award had nothing to do with Pine Creek or Mr. Rios at the time of his 2017 stay. Furthermore, Plum Healthcare's prior private equity shareholder was voluntarily dismissed from the case by the plaintiffs in 2021 and is not subject to the verdict, thus rebutting the public statements made by the plaintiff's attorney that the case "sends a message" to private equity.
Skilled nursing facilities and their dedicated staff members work very hard to care for their residents with love and respect. Verdicts like this undermine the very system that the state has set up to care for elderly and infirm Californians.
The case remains in active litigation with post-trial motions, and a planned appeal.
The plantiffs claimed the staff at Pine Creek failed to prevent pressure sores on his heels during his brief stay in 2017, before returning home to convalesce after hip surgery. Pine Creek's attorneys presented strong medical evidence that disputed the plaintiff's claims, arguing there was no skin breakdown observed by nursing staff or Mr. Rios' treating physician during his stay. In fact, Mr. Rios was walking and moving around far better upon discharge than when he was admitted.
The limitations put on the defendants' ability to fully defend themselves, coupled with the court granting the plaintiffs' request to instruct the jury that the defendants engaged in a plan to maximize profits at the expense of patient care, which is both false and grossly prejudicial, are denials of the defendant's rights to due process and a fair trial that will be addressed on appeal.
More on The Californer
- Ventura County Credit Union launches comprehensive financial wellness program for County Employees
- Governor Newsom supports nearly 700,000 earn and learn opportunities, announces 49,000 new apprenticeships for Californians
- United Debt Relief Tells Borrowers Weighing a Consolidation Loan to Compare the APR, Not the Payment
- Heritage at South Brunswick Announces Special Townhome Mortgage Rate Buydown
- Heritage at Hopewell Announces Limited-Time Mortgage Rate Buydown on Select Quick Move-In Townhomes
As evidenced by testimony presented at trial, 87-year-old Mr. Rios was at Pine Creek for 14 days, he both arrived at Pine Creek with redness on his heels went home from Pine Creek with redness on its heels, and left Pine Creek with a considerably better ability to walk than when he arrived from the hospital following hip surgery. The defendants strongly believe that his care at Pine Creek was reasonable, appropriate, and consistent with the doctor's orders.
Pine Creek is one of the premier skilled nursing facilities in the Sacramento area. At the time of Mr. Rios's stay Pine Creek was a CMS 5-Star facility overall, and it continues to be highly rated. The defendants were not allowed to present that information.
Pine Creek complied with state minimum staffing requirements, and Mr. Rios in fact progressed considerably in his post-surgery healing process while he was at Pine Creek, as evidenced by a significant increase in his ability to walk during his time at the facility. This is all consistent with Pine Creek's continuing focus on providing high-quality care to its residents, and that focus is reflected in its CMS ratings and reputation in the community. Plum Healthcare supported its affiliated facilities in their efforts to care for their residents.
More on The Californer
- City of Long Beach to Host Two Sandbag Distribution Events at Long Beach City College to Prepare Residents for Winter
- Impact & Influence December 2026: Joel Rodriguez Tirado on Reflection, Refocus & Moving Forward
- Air Force Veteran Sean Douglas Delivers Powerful Suicide Prevention Presentations to Hundreds of Marines at Camp Pendleton
- Governor Newsom helps nearly 12,000 Californians switch to electric cars, leaving Trump's skyrocketing gas prices in the rearview mirror
- Veteran-Owned Gopher Stop Highlights Temecula Valley Services as Fall Gopher Activity Returns
It's also very difficult to understand how the jury arrived at punitive damages in this case, much less the grossly exaggerated amount they awarded. Pine Creek has been under new ownership since 2021 when Providence Group acquired the operations of Plum Healthcare, which makes the punitive damages awarded all the more incomprehensible since those being "punished" by the award had nothing to do with Pine Creek or Mr. Rios at the time of his 2017 stay. Furthermore, Plum Healthcare's prior private equity shareholder was voluntarily dismissed from the case by the plaintiffs in 2021 and is not subject to the verdict, thus rebutting the public statements made by the plaintiff's attorney that the case "sends a message" to private equity.
Skilled nursing facilities and their dedicated staff members work very hard to care for their residents with love and respect. Verdicts like this undermine the very system that the state has set up to care for elderly and infirm Californians.
The case remains in active litigation with post-trial motions, and a planned appeal.
Source: PACS
Filed Under: Health
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- Higginswerx and Mirrorize Unveil 'Mirror 9: The Hollowing'
- PQCrypto Appoints Tejas Shah to Its Board of Directors
- Critical FDA Milestone much Closer as Preservative-Free Ketamine Review Advances: NRx Pharmaceuticals (N A S D A Q: NRXP)
- Kern County Tops California's Fentanyl Treatment Deserts
- California students' academic achievements continue rising under the Newsom administration
- The Wait Is Over: Jessicurl Is Officially Live on Ulta.com Marketplace
- Benchmark International Facilitated the Trans BT Streamline Avionics, Inc. and Aero1 Group
- AutoProIT Achieves Cyber Essentials Certification, Reinforcing Its Commitment to Secure Digital Transformation
- LinkedIn Security Findings, Cyber Defense Magazine November 2026
- DayPass llega a ChatGPT y Claude
- DayPass launches in ChatGPT and Claude
- Connect Welcomes 13 New Board Members to Help San Diego Innovation Move as One
- Fall Winter Jewellery Trends 2026: Elegant Gold Bracelets and Timeless Accessories for Every Occasion
- Luna Select Market Announces Major Product Expansion to Meet Growing Customer Demand
- Renkeer Water Quality Sensors Support Efficient Operation of AI Liquid Cooling Systems
- California: Governor Newsom announces appointments 10.14.26
- Victor Archibong Expands ItsArchiDuh Creator Brand
- Long Beach: Great ShakeOut 2026: Get Ready for the International Earthquake Drill
- Apple Valley Home Sales Fall 10.6% as Active Listings Decline 22.2% in September 2026
- Which Redondo Beach hotels have EV charging? South Bay hotels near LAX and Northrop Grumman with chargers, compared