Trending...
- California: Governor Newsom proclaims Independence Day 2025
- New Release: 'The Invisible Alternative' Unveiled by Atrisk Corporation, Resilient
- Transgender Visual Artist Debuts New Work
As genetic testing advances, results may predict not just health but personality and intelligence, raising ethical questions.
PASADENA, Calif. - Californer -- Genetic testing can provide information about individuals' health by looking for mutations in DNA. The results may empower people to seek treatment, adopt healthier habits, and better prepare them for the future.
A large portion (https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/gen...) of testing determines individuals' risk for having, developing, or being a carrier of a genetic disorder. Depending on the reasons for the test (https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/gen...), the results are used differently. A positive diagnostic test may mean starting a treatment plan. A carrier test may be useful before having children.
Another type of testing used in family planning is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). This looks for markers of diseases and disorders in an embryo. PGD has been at the center of much controversy especially for those that believe life begins at fertilization. However, U.S. laws and health policy do not confirm this belief as they progressively place greater moral status on embryos, fetuses, and newborns as they develop.
More on The Californer
Opponents also object to this type of genetic testing believing it will lessen genetic diversity (https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/preimplantation-genetic-diagnosis/2001-08). Advocates for those with disabilities add selection discriminates against those with disabilities. Those against PGD argue parents will begin selecting based not just on "health" but preferences for things such as appearance, "talent, personality...even though it is not technically possible at this time."
Discrimination based on genetic testing was a real concern before the passing of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) in 2008. The law focuses on protecting people in employment and health insurance. But one article in the Oxford Academic Journal of Law and the Biosciences (https://academic.oup.com/jlb/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jlb/lsz016/5651192) explores how more accurate and precise testing may lessen protections in both areas. Empathy has proven to be an essential skill (https://ultrahealthagency.com/fighting-covid-19...) in healthcare professions. Medical schools and hospitals could look at results before admitting students and residents. But, tests may also work against people predicting liabilities rather than assets. In high-risk situations such as driving a school bus or flying planes, employers "may have a legitimate interest (https://academic.oup.com/jlb/advance-article/do...) in genetic factors that would, hypothetically, significantly increase the chance of suffering an epileptic attack."
More on The Californer
Some may argue those with genetic conditions use healthcare services more and therefore should contribute more to the cost (https://academic.oup.com/jlb/advance-article/do...). This system would punish people for something outside their control based on possibly inaccurate results. Furthermore, despite certain, outdated arguments (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11...) against, healthcare is a basic human right. Putting barriers to care will not create a healthier society, it will only push those that cannot access care further from the help they need.
Currently, genetic information is protected. While there is room for error, testing provides useful information. Knowing family history can encourage preventative actions. Since some of these conditions are multifactorial, environmental improvements and lifestyle changes can have a positive effect.
A large portion (https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/gen...) of testing determines individuals' risk for having, developing, or being a carrier of a genetic disorder. Depending on the reasons for the test (https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/gen...), the results are used differently. A positive diagnostic test may mean starting a treatment plan. A carrier test may be useful before having children.
Another type of testing used in family planning is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). This looks for markers of diseases and disorders in an embryo. PGD has been at the center of much controversy especially for those that believe life begins at fertilization. However, U.S. laws and health policy do not confirm this belief as they progressively place greater moral status on embryos, fetuses, and newborns as they develop.
More on The Californer
- Easton & Easton, LLP Files Suit Against The Dwelling Place Anaheim & Vineyard USA Over Abuse Allegations
- AI Visibility: The Key to Beating Google's AI Overviews and Regaining Traffic
- First Partner highlights apprenticeship program helping underrepresented youth break into careers in California's iconic entertainment industry
- Stuck Doing Math or Figuring Out Life's Numbers? Calculator.now Makes It Stupidly Simple
- Cal State LA secures funding for two artificial intelligence projects from CSU
Opponents also object to this type of genetic testing believing it will lessen genetic diversity (https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/preimplantation-genetic-diagnosis/2001-08). Advocates for those with disabilities add selection discriminates against those with disabilities. Those against PGD argue parents will begin selecting based not just on "health" but preferences for things such as appearance, "talent, personality...even though it is not technically possible at this time."
Discrimination based on genetic testing was a real concern before the passing of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) in 2008. The law focuses on protecting people in employment and health insurance. But one article in the Oxford Academic Journal of Law and the Biosciences (https://academic.oup.com/jlb/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jlb/lsz016/5651192) explores how more accurate and precise testing may lessen protections in both areas. Empathy has proven to be an essential skill (https://ultrahealthagency.com/fighting-covid-19...) in healthcare professions. Medical schools and hospitals could look at results before admitting students and residents. But, tests may also work against people predicting liabilities rather than assets. In high-risk situations such as driving a school bus or flying planes, employers "may have a legitimate interest (https://academic.oup.com/jlb/advance-article/do...) in genetic factors that would, hypothetically, significantly increase the chance of suffering an epileptic attack."
More on The Californer
- Colbert Packaging Announces WBENC Recognition
- New Mobile Car Detailing Platform Connects Drivers with On-Demand Local Pros
- Over the past three months, California seized $476 million worth of unlicensed cannabis products
- California scores more clean energy records: 9 in 10 days this year partially powered by 100% clean energy
- "Mobile Suit Gundam" Takes Over San Diego Comic-Con 2025
Some may argue those with genetic conditions use healthcare services more and therefore should contribute more to the cost (https://academic.oup.com/jlb/advance-article/do...). This system would punish people for something outside their control based on possibly inaccurate results. Furthermore, despite certain, outdated arguments (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11...) against, healthcare is a basic human right. Putting barriers to care will not create a healthier society, it will only push those that cannot access care further from the help they need.
Currently, genetic information is protected. While there is room for error, testing provides useful information. Knowing family history can encourage preventative actions. Since some of these conditions are multifactorial, environmental improvements and lifestyle changes can have a positive effect.
Source: ultraHealth Agency
Filed Under: Health
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- Voices for Humanity Builds a Better Future for Ghana with Richmond Atta-Williams
- Haunted Doll House at The Gregangelo Museum
- Mystical Insights at the Gregangelo Museum
- Ben Pouladian, CEO of BEP Holdings, to Join ISPE Los Angeles Biomanufacturing Panel
- Raksmart: Promoting Security in Global Hosting Service
- $14M Expansion Deal with Famed David Lloyd Highlights Rebrand of Sports, Entertainment and Gaming Innovation by AI Driven, Online Fan Engagement Co
- Local Pub Grows Unique Community Ownership Program
- Heartfelt Dreams Foundation Launches Campaign to Build CHD Hospital
- California: Acting Governor Eleni Kounalakis proclaims Disability Pride Month
- CHRIS EDMONDS JOINS CITY NATIONAL BANK AS EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, HEAD OF COMMERCIAL AND NATIONAL CORPORATE BANKING
- Radarsign Tackles Intersection Safety with Launch of Grid-Free Solar LED Stop Sign
- California: $35 million to law enforcement partners to keep communities safe from impaired driving
- Curtis Sergeant's Book The Only One Continues to Equip Christians to Live Fully in by and for God
- IFYA Announces New Froyo Heaven Art Contest
- BKM Capital Partners Publishes Case Study on Hughes Airport Center, Showcasing Strategic Value-Add Execution in Las Vegas
- Miami Real Estate Agent Drastically Increases Interest In Homes
- Adostics & Genmega Announce the Introduction of A-POD
- Auto Careers Online Secures Top Dealers' Choice Award for Eighth Consecutive Year
- MANTL Becomes First Fintech to Offer Plaid Layer
- LIB and Nidec Rejoin Forces for Giant TH-0098 Temperature Humidity Test Chamber