District Court Central District Of California Jonathon Ramos Vs Elizabeth Singleton, El Al
The Californer/10307565

LOS ANGELES - Californer -- Jonathon Ramos, Plaintiff in Case No. 8:25-CV-00254-SPG-SSC, filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, alleges a systematic campaign of civil rights violations perpetrated by Defendants, including Elizabeth Singleton, and others, involving the use of a Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) 100x and a complex web of legal obstruction, with evidence indicating responsibility originating in San Diego filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserts that Defendants have engaged  a pattern of misconduct encompassing the use of the LRAD 100x to inflict harm and manipulate the Plaintiff. The LRAD 100x, a powerful acoustic hailing device, is alleged to have been used in a manner that constitutes excessive force and violates the Plaintiff's constitutional rights.

Technological Deception (PMB-TD-404)
Divide and Conquer (PMB-DC-505)
Controlled Narrative (PMB-CN-606)
Covert Operations (PMB-CO-707)
Influence and Control (PMB-IC-808)

More on The Californer

• California: Governor Newsom proclaims Independence Day 2025
• Gundam GQuuuuuuX Takes Center Stage at Anime Expo 2025
• John Duffy Competes in Mr Muscle Beach
• New Release: 'The Invisible Alternative' Unveiled by Atrisk Corporation, Resilient
• Thorn & Bloom Magazine Unveils Groundbreaking Second Edition: "Breaking the Cycle"

Denial and Deception (PMB-DD-909)
Weaponization of Public Perception (PMB-WP-010): Defamation and manipulation of public opinion.
Strategic Manipulation (PMB-SM-101)
Information Warfare (PMB-IW-202)
Psychological Operations (PMB-PO-303)

The evidence details allegations of conspiracy (Penal Code § 182, 18 U.S.C. § 371), aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C. § 2), obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), false reporting of misconduct (Penal Code § 832.5), destruction of evidence (Penal Code § 832.7), contempt of court (Penal Code § 166), assault with a deadly weapon (Penal Code § 245), computer fraud and abuse (18 U.S.C. § 1030), and identity theft (Penal Code 530.5).
violations of his Fourth, First, Fourteenth, Eighth, and Sixth Amendment rights, and cites legal doctrines including collateral estoppel, res ipsa loquitur, law of the case, judicial notice, adverse inference, doctrine of unclean hands, doctrine of estoppel by silence, and cites key cases such as Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, Strickland v. Washington, and United States v. Agurs.

Released:

Plaintiff has released exhibits via Dropbox, accessible at which contain evidence supporting these allegations, including confessions indicating the involvement of individuals and entities in San Diego, CA.

Evidence:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/66l7slhlj86yq8bnz5ywl/AK4Mxd14eO6vCkskYFCHVgU?rlkey=288fw8ezqnbw6toaf9lzyzlau&st=k7pvywvw&dl=0