Trending...
- First Partner Siebel Newsom celebrates California's nation-leading Farm to School program at statewide summit - 195
- Governor Newsom supports nearly 700,000 earn and learn opportunities, announces 49,000 new apprenticeships for Californians - 190
- California secures federal assistance to support response to Norte Fire in Orange County - 130
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 4, 2022
Media Contact:
Rachel Davis, Chief Communications Officer, Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo, rachel.davis@sanjoseca.gov
SAN JOSÉ, CA – On Wednesday, a federal trial court denied an attempt from gun rights organizations to halt the implementation of San José's groundbreaking law requiring gun owners to obtain civil liability insurance, and to pay a fee to support gun violence-reduction programs. The San José City Council approved those measures in January of 2022, making it the first city, state, or jurisdiction of any kind to impose such a mandate on gun owners. Several similar proposals have emerged in other cities and states since San José's introduction of their measure.
U.S. District Court Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued a decision denying the gun organizations' motion to issue a preliminary injunction in this matter, holding at this early stage in the case, that the insurance requirement bears sufficient resemblance to 19th century surety laws as to satisfy the Supreme Court's standard for historic consistency, as articulated last month in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The U.S. District Court also decided that the fee mandate was not yet ripe for review until the City sets the specific fee amount, yet the court's opinion indicated that the mere imposition of a fee itself does not run afoul of the Second Amendment, because– "the Supreme Court in Bruen expressly contemplated regulations that may permissibly include fee payments, so long as the fees were not so 'exorbitant [so as to] deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.'"
More on The Californer
Tamarah Prevost, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy, argued the motions for the City of San José. Ms. Prevost asserted that the court's order, "is a preliminary positive development, in that it prevents one gun rights group from immediately blocking San José's groundbreaking law. We will continue to defend the City on a pro bono basis against other attacks to this law, which we believe is firmly constitutional."
San José Mayor Sam Liccardo, who led the effort to propose and adopt these measures last year after extensive study and robust public debate, lauded the decision as an "important step forward for sensible gun regulation." Liccardo continued, "To confront the scourge of escalating gun violence in our nation, we need bolder, more impactful, and more creative solutions than the half-measures that have emerged from Congress. Cities have become the nation's laboratories of policy innovation, and we hope that our efforts will spur others to follow suit, and save lives."
"Our office drafted the ordinance based on the Council's direction and policy goals, mindful of the Constitutional and other legal issues. We appreciate the Court's guidance as the City develops implementing regulations," said City Attorney Nora Frimann, who drafted the measures, agreed with the District Court decision.
Liccardo and his Council colleagues proposed these measures as a means to reduce gun harm. Specifically, insurance would operate to compensate victims of unintentional shootings, while utilizing risk-adjusted insurance premiums to induce safer behavior among gun owners, such as using a gun safe, installing a trigger lock or chamber-load indicator, or taking gun safety courses. The fee requirement would support gun violence prevention programs, specifically supporting mental health counseling, suicide, and domestic violence prevention programs, and gun safety courses targeted at residents in gun-owning households, among other potential initiatives. No other city or state has yet implemented either of these types of interventions, but a gun liability insurance requirement has been previously proposed in several state legislatures—including recently in California--and Congress.
More on The Californer
The City expects the litigation to continue, as the City pursues a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which will be heard today at 9 a.m.
###
About the City of San José
With more than one million residents, San José comprises the 10th largest city in the United States, and one of its most diverse cities. San José's transformation into a global innovation center in the heart of Silicon Valley has resulted in the world's greatest concentration of technology talent and development.
August 4, 2022
Media Contact:
Rachel Davis, Chief Communications Officer, Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo, rachel.davis@sanjoseca.gov
SAN JOSÉ, CA – On Wednesday, a federal trial court denied an attempt from gun rights organizations to halt the implementation of San José's groundbreaking law requiring gun owners to obtain civil liability insurance, and to pay a fee to support gun violence-reduction programs. The San José City Council approved those measures in January of 2022, making it the first city, state, or jurisdiction of any kind to impose such a mandate on gun owners. Several similar proposals have emerged in other cities and states since San José's introduction of their measure.
U.S. District Court Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued a decision denying the gun organizations' motion to issue a preliminary injunction in this matter, holding at this early stage in the case, that the insurance requirement bears sufficient resemblance to 19th century surety laws as to satisfy the Supreme Court's standard for historic consistency, as articulated last month in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The U.S. District Court also decided that the fee mandate was not yet ripe for review until the City sets the specific fee amount, yet the court's opinion indicated that the mere imposition of a fee itself does not run afoul of the Second Amendment, because– "the Supreme Court in Bruen expressly contemplated regulations that may permissibly include fee payments, so long as the fees were not so 'exorbitant [so as to] deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.'"
More on The Californer
- Repair Shop Solutions Adds Group Texting to RSS Texting
- Most Dangerous Types of Footwear Ranked
- Isee Hair Launches Halloween Wig Sale: Get Up to 50% Off Your Favorite Wigs!
- Marcus Fogle Announces Release of Something Worth Building: My Story of Independence and Possibility
- Trencher Leon Escapes Afghanistan After Launching Crypto Corner Shop Against Extraordinary Odds
Tamarah Prevost, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy, argued the motions for the City of San José. Ms. Prevost asserted that the court's order, "is a preliminary positive development, in that it prevents one gun rights group from immediately blocking San José's groundbreaking law. We will continue to defend the City on a pro bono basis against other attacks to this law, which we believe is firmly constitutional."
San José Mayor Sam Liccardo, who led the effort to propose and adopt these measures last year after extensive study and robust public debate, lauded the decision as an "important step forward for sensible gun regulation." Liccardo continued, "To confront the scourge of escalating gun violence in our nation, we need bolder, more impactful, and more creative solutions than the half-measures that have emerged from Congress. Cities have become the nation's laboratories of policy innovation, and we hope that our efforts will spur others to follow suit, and save lives."
"Our office drafted the ordinance based on the Council's direction and policy goals, mindful of the Constitutional and other legal issues. We appreciate the Court's guidance as the City develops implementing regulations," said City Attorney Nora Frimann, who drafted the measures, agreed with the District Court decision.
Liccardo and his Council colleagues proposed these measures as a means to reduce gun harm. Specifically, insurance would operate to compensate victims of unintentional shootings, while utilizing risk-adjusted insurance premiums to induce safer behavior among gun owners, such as using a gun safe, installing a trigger lock or chamber-load indicator, or taking gun safety courses. The fee requirement would support gun violence prevention programs, specifically supporting mental health counseling, suicide, and domestic violence prevention programs, and gun safety courses targeted at residents in gun-owning households, among other potential initiatives. No other city or state has yet implemented either of these types of interventions, but a gun liability insurance requirement has been previously proposed in several state legislatures—including recently in California--and Congress.
More on The Californer
- SoSexDoll Adds Material Guides and Care Information to U.S. Online Store for Adult Companion Dolls
- USFITC Completes Additional Component Delivery Supporting Japan's Aerospace Industry
- Pier 210 Dental Group Voted Best Auburn CA Dentist with Kim Willingham Named Best Hygienist
- California: Governor Newsom announces clemency actions
- California: Governor Newsom announces appointments 10.22.2026
The City expects the litigation to continue, as the City pursues a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which will be heard today at 9 a.m.
###
About the City of San José
With more than one million residents, San José comprises the 10th largest city in the United States, and one of its most diverse cities. San José's transformation into a global innovation center in the heart of Silicon Valley has resulted in the world's greatest concentration of technology talent and development.
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- THE DASH CAM: THINKWARE Announces Halloween Savings on Dash Cams
- City of Long Beach Announces Retirement of Chief of Police Wally Hebeish
- San Diego Plastic Surgeon Dr. Paul Chasan Highlights the "Thong Lift" as an Approach to Sagging Skin
- California: Governor Newsom announces new staff-led initiative at Corcoran to support rehabilitation and reentry
- Registration for Long Beach's Winter Recreation Classes Begins Nov. 2
- Governor Newsom slams Trump's disaster retreat as California prepares for dangerous El Niño storms
- Nationwide Boiler's Chelsey Ryker Honored With WIBI Excellence Award
- Reggae on the River Returns to County Line June 25 - 27, 2027
- Incredible Jackpot Won on Just a $1 Bet
- WOWX labs Closes US$10 Million Founder-Led Growth Financing as WOWX.market Enters Scale Phase
- BESTBUYSTORE opens its dropshipping model to independent merchants
- America's Hometown Thanksgiving Parade in Plymouth, MA, on Saturday, November 21, 2026
- Navigating a Changing Market: How AIX Group Is Responding to a Challenging Year
- 450 Million Revenue Run Rate, Global Telecom Reach and a New Digital Growth Opportunity Take Center Stage: IQSTEL, Inc. (N A S D A Q: IQST)
- Wave Helicopters Takes FLIBS 2026 to New Heights
- iLoveToCreate.com Becomes a New Creative Destination for Makers, DIYers and Everyday Inspiration
- Canada's First Data Lakehouse Goes Global in Banking: Nabil Bank Becomes Nepal's First Bank to Implement a True Agentic Lakehouse Platform, DataNature
- Latin GRAMMY-Winning Cuban-American Conductor Dr Yalil Guerra to Lead Pepperdine's Oklahoma!
- Highsfield Showcases Earth Zoom Generator for Cinematic AI Videos
- Patton AI Launches Patton Hive 4.5: Wartime Breakthroughs for Drones and Robots When GPS Goes Dark