Trending...
- Governor Newsom meets with World Health Organization Director-General, announces California becomes first state to join WHO-coordinated international network - 114
- Queen Sheba Heads to the GRAMMYs as Three-Time Nominee & Featured Artist in New Documentary Series
- At World Economic Forum, Governor Newsom announces California shattered clean car goal, surpassing 2.5M ZEV sales despite Trump's chaos
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 4, 2022
Media Contact:
Rachel Davis, Chief Communications Officer, Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo, rachel.davis@sanjoseca.gov
SAN JOSÉ, CA – On Wednesday, a federal trial court denied an attempt from gun rights organizations to halt the implementation of San José's groundbreaking law requiring gun owners to obtain civil liability insurance, and to pay a fee to support gun violence-reduction programs. The San José City Council approved those measures in January of 2022, making it the first city, state, or jurisdiction of any kind to impose such a mandate on gun owners. Several similar proposals have emerged in other cities and states since San José's introduction of their measure.
U.S. District Court Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued a decision denying the gun organizations' motion to issue a preliminary injunction in this matter, holding at this early stage in the case, that the insurance requirement bears sufficient resemblance to 19th century surety laws as to satisfy the Supreme Court's standard for historic consistency, as articulated last month in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The U.S. District Court also decided that the fee mandate was not yet ripe for review until the City sets the specific fee amount, yet the court's opinion indicated that the mere imposition of a fee itself does not run afoul of the Second Amendment, because– "the Supreme Court in Bruen expressly contemplated regulations that may permissibly include fee payments, so long as the fees were not so 'exorbitant [so as to] deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.'"
More on The Californer
Tamarah Prevost, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy, argued the motions for the City of San José. Ms. Prevost asserted that the court's order, "is a preliminary positive development, in that it prevents one gun rights group from immediately blocking San José's groundbreaking law. We will continue to defend the City on a pro bono basis against other attacks to this law, which we believe is firmly constitutional."
San José Mayor Sam Liccardo, who led the effort to propose and adopt these measures last year after extensive study and robust public debate, lauded the decision as an "important step forward for sensible gun regulation." Liccardo continued, "To confront the scourge of escalating gun violence in our nation, we need bolder, more impactful, and more creative solutions than the half-measures that have emerged from Congress. Cities have become the nation's laboratories of policy innovation, and we hope that our efforts will spur others to follow suit, and save lives."
"Our office drafted the ordinance based on the Council's direction and policy goals, mindful of the Constitutional and other legal issues. We appreciate the Court's guidance as the City develops implementing regulations," said City Attorney Nora Frimann, who drafted the measures, agreed with the District Court decision.
Liccardo and his Council colleagues proposed these measures as a means to reduce gun harm. Specifically, insurance would operate to compensate victims of unintentional shootings, while utilizing risk-adjusted insurance premiums to induce safer behavior among gun owners, such as using a gun safe, installing a trigger lock or chamber-load indicator, or taking gun safety courses. The fee requirement would support gun violence prevention programs, specifically supporting mental health counseling, suicide, and domestic violence prevention programs, and gun safety courses targeted at residents in gun-owning households, among other potential initiatives. No other city or state has yet implemented either of these types of interventions, but a gun liability insurance requirement has been previously proposed in several state legislatures—including recently in California--and Congress.
More on The Californer
The City expects the litigation to continue, as the City pursues a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which will be heard today at 9 a.m.
###
About the City of San José
With more than one million residents, San José comprises the 10th largest city in the United States, and one of its most diverse cities. San José's transformation into a global innovation center in the heart of Silicon Valley has resulted in the world's greatest concentration of technology talent and development.
August 4, 2022
Media Contact:
Rachel Davis, Chief Communications Officer, Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo, rachel.davis@sanjoseca.gov
SAN JOSÉ, CA – On Wednesday, a federal trial court denied an attempt from gun rights organizations to halt the implementation of San José's groundbreaking law requiring gun owners to obtain civil liability insurance, and to pay a fee to support gun violence-reduction programs. The San José City Council approved those measures in January of 2022, making it the first city, state, or jurisdiction of any kind to impose such a mandate on gun owners. Several similar proposals have emerged in other cities and states since San José's introduction of their measure.
U.S. District Court Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued a decision denying the gun organizations' motion to issue a preliminary injunction in this matter, holding at this early stage in the case, that the insurance requirement bears sufficient resemblance to 19th century surety laws as to satisfy the Supreme Court's standard for historic consistency, as articulated last month in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The U.S. District Court also decided that the fee mandate was not yet ripe for review until the City sets the specific fee amount, yet the court's opinion indicated that the mere imposition of a fee itself does not run afoul of the Second Amendment, because– "the Supreme Court in Bruen expressly contemplated regulations that may permissibly include fee payments, so long as the fees were not so 'exorbitant [so as to] deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.'"
More on The Californer
- American Disabilities Act Must Protect Against Forced Psychiatric Commitment and Treatment
- Esrā Dunca‑Sprawling, Husband of Tech Titan Andrei Dunca, Files Missing Persons Report in Harris County Court
- Valentine's Gift Ideas for Her: Affordable Luxury Jewellery That Looks Expensive (But Isn't)
- 2025 Top Lawyers - ELA Awards by Expert Law Attorneys
- Top Law Firms In 2025 - Expert Law Attorneys
Tamarah Prevost, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy, argued the motions for the City of San José. Ms. Prevost asserted that the court's order, "is a preliminary positive development, in that it prevents one gun rights group from immediately blocking San José's groundbreaking law. We will continue to defend the City on a pro bono basis against other attacks to this law, which we believe is firmly constitutional."
San José Mayor Sam Liccardo, who led the effort to propose and adopt these measures last year after extensive study and robust public debate, lauded the decision as an "important step forward for sensible gun regulation." Liccardo continued, "To confront the scourge of escalating gun violence in our nation, we need bolder, more impactful, and more creative solutions than the half-measures that have emerged from Congress. Cities have become the nation's laboratories of policy innovation, and we hope that our efforts will spur others to follow suit, and save lives."
"Our office drafted the ordinance based on the Council's direction and policy goals, mindful of the Constitutional and other legal issues. We appreciate the Court's guidance as the City develops implementing regulations," said City Attorney Nora Frimann, who drafted the measures, agreed with the District Court decision.
Liccardo and his Council colleagues proposed these measures as a means to reduce gun harm. Specifically, insurance would operate to compensate victims of unintentional shootings, while utilizing risk-adjusted insurance premiums to induce safer behavior among gun owners, such as using a gun safe, installing a trigger lock or chamber-load indicator, or taking gun safety courses. The fee requirement would support gun violence prevention programs, specifically supporting mental health counseling, suicide, and domestic violence prevention programs, and gun safety courses targeted at residents in gun-owning households, among other potential initiatives. No other city or state has yet implemented either of these types of interventions, but a gun liability insurance requirement has been previously proposed in several state legislatures—including recently in California--and Congress.
More on The Californer
- Best Personal Injury Attorneys Of 2025 - ELA Awards
- Best Personal Injury Law Firms 2025 - ELA Awards
- Baruch Arcade Launches AI-Powered Gaming Platform on Solana, do I smell an airdrop?
- Expert Law Attorneys 2025 Best Attorneys
- Best Family Law Attorneys Of 2025 - ELA Awards
The City expects the litigation to continue, as the City pursues a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which will be heard today at 9 a.m.
###
About the City of San José
With more than one million residents, San José comprises the 10th largest city in the United States, and one of its most diverse cities. San José's transformation into a global innovation center in the heart of Silicon Valley has resulted in the world's greatest concentration of technology talent and development.
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- California: Governor Newsom proclaims Ed Roberts Day 2026
- $80 Million Revenue Backlog for AI Cybersecurity Company Building the Future of Integrated Cybersecurity and Public Safety: $CYCU
- The Brave and the Rescued Honors LA Fire Department First Responders
- Long Beach: City Clerk to Hold Candidate Workshop for June 2 Primary Nominating Election
- Slick Cash Loan shares credit score tips for borrowers using bad credit loans
- Sumcoin Marketplace Expands Peer-to-Peer Trading, Launches User Rewards Through the Sumcoin Wallet
- Crossroads4Hope Welcomes New Trustees to Board of Directors as Organization Enters 25th Year of Caring
- Attorney Credits Launches New CLE Course: Perfectionism in the Legal Profession with Brian Quinn
- Inside Secondhand Stories: The Hidden Gem Etsy Shop Where Books Are Chosen with Heart
- Governor Newsom meets with World Health Organization Director-General, announces California becomes first state to join WHO-coordinated international network
- Cygnet Theatre Announces The Lineup For Its Second Season In Arts District Liberty Station
- 14th February Gift Ideas for Her: Affordable Luxury Jewellery That Looks Expensive (But Isn't)
- Weaver Performing Arts Is Back To Melt Hearts With Frozen Jr. At The Merced Theatre
- Detection of Concealed Explosives Using Terahertz Spectral Imaging and Deep Learning
- PromptBuilder.cc Launches AI Prompt Generator Optimized For ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok & Claude
- CMAC Institute Announces Machine-Verified Derivation of Fundamental Physics and Constant Alpha
- UK Financial Ltd Advances Compliance Strategy With January 30th CATEX Exchange Listing Of Maya Preferred PRA Preferred Class Regulated Security Token
- City of Long Beach to Host Virtual Community Meeting on Junipero Dog Beach Project
- Biobase Announces Strategic Investment from BJC Health to Advance AI-Powered Healthcare Data OS
- Big Game Fuels Child Trafficking Prevention