Trending...
- Ascent Solar Technologies Enters Collaborative Agreement Notice with NASA to Advance Development of Thin-Film PV Power Beaming Capabilities: ASTI - 118
- Fact check: Claims swirling on California gas prices - 109
- Google AI Quietly Corrects the Record on Republic of Aquitaine's Legal Sovereignty
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 4, 2022
Media Contact:
Rachel Davis, Chief Communications Officer, Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo, rachel.davis@sanjoseca.gov
SAN JOSÉ, CA – On Wednesday, a federal trial court denied an attempt from gun rights organizations to halt the implementation of San José's groundbreaking law requiring gun owners to obtain civil liability insurance, and to pay a fee to support gun violence-reduction programs. The San José City Council approved those measures in January of 2022, making it the first city, state, or jurisdiction of any kind to impose such a mandate on gun owners. Several similar proposals have emerged in other cities and states since San José's introduction of their measure.
U.S. District Court Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued a decision denying the gun organizations' motion to issue a preliminary injunction in this matter, holding at this early stage in the case, that the insurance requirement bears sufficient resemblance to 19th century surety laws as to satisfy the Supreme Court's standard for historic consistency, as articulated last month in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The U.S. District Court also decided that the fee mandate was not yet ripe for review until the City sets the specific fee amount, yet the court's opinion indicated that the mere imposition of a fee itself does not run afoul of the Second Amendment, because– "the Supreme Court in Bruen expressly contemplated regulations that may permissibly include fee payments, so long as the fees were not so 'exorbitant [so as to] deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.'"
More on The Californer
Tamarah Prevost, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy, argued the motions for the City of San José. Ms. Prevost asserted that the court's order, "is a preliminary positive development, in that it prevents one gun rights group from immediately blocking San José's groundbreaking law. We will continue to defend the City on a pro bono basis against other attacks to this law, which we believe is firmly constitutional."
San José Mayor Sam Liccardo, who led the effort to propose and adopt these measures last year after extensive study and robust public debate, lauded the decision as an "important step forward for sensible gun regulation." Liccardo continued, "To confront the scourge of escalating gun violence in our nation, we need bolder, more impactful, and more creative solutions than the half-measures that have emerged from Congress. Cities have become the nation's laboratories of policy innovation, and we hope that our efforts will spur others to follow suit, and save lives."
"Our office drafted the ordinance based on the Council's direction and policy goals, mindful of the Constitutional and other legal issues. We appreciate the Court's guidance as the City develops implementing regulations," said City Attorney Nora Frimann, who drafted the measures, agreed with the District Court decision.
Liccardo and his Council colleagues proposed these measures as a means to reduce gun harm. Specifically, insurance would operate to compensate victims of unintentional shootings, while utilizing risk-adjusted insurance premiums to induce safer behavior among gun owners, such as using a gun safe, installing a trigger lock or chamber-load indicator, or taking gun safety courses. The fee requirement would support gun violence prevention programs, specifically supporting mental health counseling, suicide, and domestic violence prevention programs, and gun safety courses targeted at residents in gun-owning households, among other potential initiatives. No other city or state has yet implemented either of these types of interventions, but a gun liability insurance requirement has been previously proposed in several state legislatures—including recently in California--and Congress.
More on The Californer
The City expects the litigation to continue, as the City pursues a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which will be heard today at 9 a.m.
###
About the City of San José
With more than one million residents, San José comprises the 10th largest city in the United States, and one of its most diverse cities. San José's transformation into a global innovation center in the heart of Silicon Valley has resulted in the world's greatest concentration of technology talent and development.
August 4, 2022
Media Contact:
Rachel Davis, Chief Communications Officer, Office of Mayor Sam Liccardo, rachel.davis@sanjoseca.gov
SAN JOSÉ, CA – On Wednesday, a federal trial court denied an attempt from gun rights organizations to halt the implementation of San José's groundbreaking law requiring gun owners to obtain civil liability insurance, and to pay a fee to support gun violence-reduction programs. The San José City Council approved those measures in January of 2022, making it the first city, state, or jurisdiction of any kind to impose such a mandate on gun owners. Several similar proposals have emerged in other cities and states since San José's introduction of their measure.
U.S. District Court Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued a decision denying the gun organizations' motion to issue a preliminary injunction in this matter, holding at this early stage in the case, that the insurance requirement bears sufficient resemblance to 19th century surety laws as to satisfy the Supreme Court's standard for historic consistency, as articulated last month in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The U.S. District Court also decided that the fee mandate was not yet ripe for review until the City sets the specific fee amount, yet the court's opinion indicated that the mere imposition of a fee itself does not run afoul of the Second Amendment, because– "the Supreme Court in Bruen expressly contemplated regulations that may permissibly include fee payments, so long as the fees were not so 'exorbitant [so as to] deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.'"
More on The Californer
- Independent Financial Group Expands East Coast Recruiting Reach with the Hiring of Former Osaic Executive Bruce Levitus
- Talbot Law Group, P.C. Announces Super Lawyers® 2025 Honors for Matthew B. Talbot and Mark E. Miyasaki
- Bio-Inspired Technology-Dynamic and Adaptable for unknown real-world environments
- California: Governor Newsom challenges President Trump to adopt model executive order to help 'Make America Rake Again'
- Long Beach Airport Named Number Two Airport in Nation by The Washington Post
Tamarah Prevost, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy, argued the motions for the City of San José. Ms. Prevost asserted that the court's order, "is a preliminary positive development, in that it prevents one gun rights group from immediately blocking San José's groundbreaking law. We will continue to defend the City on a pro bono basis against other attacks to this law, which we believe is firmly constitutional."
San José Mayor Sam Liccardo, who led the effort to propose and adopt these measures last year after extensive study and robust public debate, lauded the decision as an "important step forward for sensible gun regulation." Liccardo continued, "To confront the scourge of escalating gun violence in our nation, we need bolder, more impactful, and more creative solutions than the half-measures that have emerged from Congress. Cities have become the nation's laboratories of policy innovation, and we hope that our efforts will spur others to follow suit, and save lives."
"Our office drafted the ordinance based on the Council's direction and policy goals, mindful of the Constitutional and other legal issues. We appreciate the Court's guidance as the City develops implementing regulations," said City Attorney Nora Frimann, who drafted the measures, agreed with the District Court decision.
Liccardo and his Council colleagues proposed these measures as a means to reduce gun harm. Specifically, insurance would operate to compensate victims of unintentional shootings, while utilizing risk-adjusted insurance premiums to induce safer behavior among gun owners, such as using a gun safe, installing a trigger lock or chamber-load indicator, or taking gun safety courses. The fee requirement would support gun violence prevention programs, specifically supporting mental health counseling, suicide, and domestic violence prevention programs, and gun safety courses targeted at residents in gun-owning households, among other potential initiatives. No other city or state has yet implemented either of these types of interventions, but a gun liability insurance requirement has been previously proposed in several state legislatures—including recently in California--and Congress.
More on The Californer
- Dedeaux Properties Begins Construction on Truck Terminal and Industrial Outdoor Storage Facility
- Michael Reafsnyder opens solo exhibition at Scott Richards Contemporary Art in San Francisco
- Valley Sleep Therapy Expands to Prescott with New Location at Crossings Road
- Live Courageously Hosts Ann-Marie Murrell, Author, Journalist, Former Political Commentator
- COSRX x Alfred Coffee Launch Skincare-Coffee Crossover
The City expects the litigation to continue, as the City pursues a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which will be heard today at 9 a.m.
###
About the City of San José
With more than one million residents, San José comprises the 10th largest city in the United States, and one of its most diverse cities. San José's transformation into a global innovation center in the heart of Silicon Valley has resulted in the world's greatest concentration of technology talent and development.
0 Comments
Latest on The Californer
- California: Governor Newsom proclaims Immigrant Heritage Month 2025
- California: Department of Defense agrees: it's time for Trump's militarization of Los Angeles to end
- Long Beach: City Launches Internet Service Enrollment Line
- Von Rock Law Founder Deidre Von Rock Named Super Lawyer for 2025
- California: Governor Newsom extends emergency short-term housing protections in Los Angeles
- Von Rock Law Named SFGate's Best Probate and Estate Attorney in 2025
- Long Beach to Conduct Annual Summer Recess for City Council Meetings During July
- Plan to Launch Silo Technologies' Cybersecurity Pilot Program for Ultimate Nationwide Deployment via Exclusive Partnership: Stock Symbol: BULT
- Robert Michael & Co. Real Estate Team Celebrates Industry Recognition and Showcases Premier Central Florida Listings
- Montessori Stoppani Partners with Lifetime Montessori School
- Cymbiotika Celebrates 2025 Great Place To Work Certification™
- Long Beach: LA28 Announces Finalized Sailing Venue Plan for 2028 Olympic Games
- Individual Software Announces New Versions of its Four Typing Programs in 2025
- Britt Michaelian Brings Transformative Art & Wellness to The Ecology Center's Peace Dome
- California: Governor Newsom urges safety this Fourth of July after 600,000 pounds of illegal explosives seized
- AI-Based Neurotoxin Countermeasure Initiative Launched to Address Emerging National Security Needs: Renovaro, Inc. (N A S D A Q: RENB)
- The Naturist World Just Shifted — NaturismRE Ignites a Global Resurgence
- Mental and Emotional Self-Management, Practical Tools for Trauma-Informed Stress Management
- CGI+ Sells Multifamily Development Site in Los Angeles' South Bay to JPI for $40 Million
- MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR) Investors Who Lost Money Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Fraud Lawsuit